Composable models and A/B tests of the 2024 ideas; add powerlaw.

Models are now a Composite of drift, volatility and (optional) shape
components, so an experiment can swap one part against a fixed control.

btcmodel/experiments.py holds seven experiments built from the ideas in the
old branches (catalogued in docs/2024-ideas.md), each with its hypothesis
and source, and a verdict rule fixed before anything ran. `just ab` runs
them on development data. Results:

- Shrinking the cycle drift, and a power-law trend (plain or reverting),
  beat their controls. The power law beats the random walk by 53-63% at
  3-4 years with unbiased outcomes, so it is promoted to MODELS.
- Every alternative volatility estimate (EWMA blends, other windows,
  reversion to a level or trend) is worse than the trailing 365-day window.
  Cycle-dependent volatility, heavy tails and stretched cycle phase show no
  reliable effect.
This commit is contained in:
sam
2026-09-24 03:01:46 -07:00
parent cfc27a38de
commit b0243adf61
18 changed files with 795 additions and 155 deletions
+43 -1
View File
@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ Command line entry point.
python -m btcmodel backtest score models on development data
python -m btcmodel backtest --holdout score models on outcomes after DEV_CUTOFF
python -m btcmodel forecast forecast from the latest price
python -m btcmodel ab [NAME ...] run A/B experiments on development data
"""
import argparse
@@ -13,7 +14,7 @@ from pathlib import Path
import numpy as np
import pandas as pd
from . import data, evaluate, plots
from . import data, evaluate, experiments, plots
from .models import MODELS
FORECAST_REPORT_HORIZONS = (182, 365, 730, 1095, 1460)
@@ -33,7 +34,11 @@ def main() -> None:
help=f"score outcomes after {data.DEV_CUTOFF:%Y-%m-%d} (don't use while developing)",
)
commands.add_parser("forecast", help="forecast from the latest price")
ab = commands.add_parser("ab", help="run A/B experiments on development data")
ab.add_argument("names", nargs="*", help="experiments to run (default: all)")
args = parser.parse_args()
if args.command == "ab" and (unknown := set(args.names) - set(experiments.EXPERIMENTS)):
parser.error(f"unknown experiments: {', '.join(sorted(unknown))}")
models = [MODELS[name] for name in args.models]
if args.command == "update":
@@ -43,6 +48,8 @@ def main() -> None:
run_backtest(models, args.output, args.holdout)
elif args.command == "forecast":
run_forecast(models, args.output)
elif args.command == "ab":
run_ab(args.names or list(experiments.EXPERIMENTS), args.output)
def run_backtest(models, output: Path, holdout: bool) -> None:
@@ -70,6 +77,41 @@ def run_backtest(models, output: Path, holdout: bool) -> None:
print(f"\nwrote {out}/")
def run_ab(names: list[str], output: Path) -> None:
prices = data.load_prices(until=data.DEV_CUTOFF)
verdicts = []
for name in names:
experiment = experiments.EXPERIMENTS[name]
scores, summary = experiments.run(experiment, prices)
out = output / "ab" / name
out.mkdir(parents=True, exist_ok=True)
control = experiment.control.name
report = (
f"{name}: {experiment.hypothesis}\n(from {experiment.source})\n\n"
+ evaluate.format_summary(summary, baseline=control)
)
print(report + "\n")
(out / "report.txt").write_text(report + "\n")
summary.to_csv(out / "summary.csv", index=False)
plots.skill_chart(summary, out / "skill.png", f"{name}: skill vs {control}", control)
plots.calibration_chart(summary, out / "calibration.png", f"{name}: interval coverage")
for variant in experiment.variants:
v = summary[summary.model == variant.name].set_index("horizon")
verdicts.append(
{
"experiment": name,
"variant": variant.name,
"control": control,
**{evaluate.horizon_label(h): f"{s:+.0%}" for h, s in v["skill"].items()},
"verdict": experiments.verdict(v),
}
)
table = pd.DataFrame(verdicts).to_string(index=False)
print(table)
(output / "ab").mkdir(parents=True, exist_ok=True)
(output / "ab" / "verdicts.txt").write_text(table + "\n")
def run_forecast(models, output: Path) -> None:
prices = data.load_prices()
horizons = np.arange(1, max(FORECAST_REPORT_HORIZONS) + 1)